Home / Breaking News / High Voltage Drama In Supreme Court, Constitution Bench Upholds That”CJI Is Master Of The Roaster” The Alert India

High Voltage Drama In Supreme Court, Constitution Bench Upholds That”CJI Is Master Of The Roaster” The Alert India

Edited by: Alert India  Desk, New Delhi [ Published on: November 10, 2017  20:20 IST ]

CJI Dipak Misra said that he strongly stands by Freedom of Speech & Expression, & that he wouldn’t gag the press from reporting this matter.

On Friday, Chief Justice of India’s Court witnessed major drama this afternoon as Adv. Prashant Bhushan stormed out of the Court, after expressing strong displeasure at not being heard.

The dramatic turn of events transpired in the Apex Court after CJI Dipak Misra constituted a Constitution Bench to hear the case relating to the attempt to influence Supreme Court Judges in a case relating to opening of Medical colleges.

A five Judge Bench of CJI Dipak Misra, Justice RK Agrawal, Justice Arun Mishra, Justice Amitava Roy & Justice AM Khanwilkar was hearing the petition filed by ‘Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Judicial Reforms’ (CJAR).

This sudden formation of Constitution Bench took place after a Bench of Justices A.K. Sikri & Ashok Bhushan this morning heard the petition filed by CJAR & directed it to be tagged along with another similar petition filed by Kamini Jaiswal.

Subsequently, a notice was issued this afternoon listing the matter for 3:00 pm before a 7-Judge Constitution Bench. Just minutes before this hearing, the strength of the Bench was changed to 5 judges.

This hearing before the Constitution Bench then witnessed high voltage arguments as the Supreme Court Bar Association President R.S. Suri, Secretary Gaurav Bhatia & a slew of advocates assembled in the Court to oppose the conduct of Petitioner’s lawyers.

They took objection to the fact that a similar petition was mentioned & heard yesterday by Justice Chelameswar, which they alleged was by-passing of the Chief Justice of India’s administrative powers.

Secretary Gaurav Bhatia argued that some Senior Lawyers were indulging in browbeating of Judges & if contempt action can be initiated against the junior lawyers or AoRs, it should equally apply to Senior counsel.

Secretary Bhatia said “A young lawyer was debarred for 1 month. Some senior counsel have been brow beating Judges. It has become a routine.”

Other Lawyers seated in the Court were also allowed to speak their concerns against the Petitioners, many of them called for action to be taken against the Petitioner’s counsel.

After lawyers finished speaking, Adv. Prashant Bhushan tried to make his arguments.

Even as he was trying to make his submissions, the Bench kept on quizzing him. Adv. Bhushan said that even those who’re not parties to this matter were heard by the Bench, but he wasn’t being allowed to speak.

However, the Bench was unrelenting. This prompted Bhushan to raise his voice & say, “Your Lordships can pass an order without hearing me, you’ve heard persons who aren’t parties to the case for 1 hour. If Your Lordships want to pass an order without hearing me, then do it!”

Then he stormed out of the Court with the marshalls escorting him.

The Supreme Court then proceeded to pass an order reaffirming that the Chief Justice of India is master of the roster & any order passed by any Judge allocating a matter to any bench’ll not hold field.

Towards the end of the hearing, CJI Dipak Misra said that he strongly stands by Freedom of Speech & Expression, & that he wouldn’t gag the press from reporting the matter.

Bench then ordered that Petition by CJAR be placed before the CJI for listing before ‘appropriate bench’.

Source – ptinews.com

About thealertindia.com

Check Also

Supreme Court Rebuked Haryana Government On Mining Issue: The Alert India

Edited by: Alert India  Desk, New Delhi [ Published on: April 30, 2018 22:10[IST ] “You cannot …

One comment

  1. Likes of individuals cannot matter the functioning of ApexCourt. It has long and established traditions and these traditions can only be by passed for good and sufficient reasons. The perception of common is there is corruption in higher judiciary and their feelings get fortified when rich and powerful get away with lenient actions of judiciary. I personally feel apex court decision to impose a “pea nut fine” in case relating to wrongful admission by medical college in Orissa decided by Apex Cour; while the management might have made huge money. Another case of Nitish Katara why apex court has reduced the punishment. OUR JUDICIARY IS ACCOUNTABLE TO THE SOCIETY AND SHOULD KEEP IN MIND “CEASER’S WIFE SHOULD BE ABOVE SUSPICION”. If there is corruption and wrong doing, it cannot be brushed under the carpet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *